And all I can think is: Must we?
The incoherent personal attacks leveled against Wolscht aren’t worth dignifying with a response, but the choice of the public to highlight her existence for scrutiny certainly deserves one. Adults who roleplay as children are not a new phenomenon by any stretch. Neither are individuals who get divorced or are estranged from their families and children. Wolscht is not remarkable for serving as some singular example of these previously unheard-of human behaviors. Instead, she is remarkable for her gender identity, in a way that a cisgender person with a life identical in every other way would not be.
If the details of Wolscht’s life are considered to be of interest to the public, they are of interest in the same way that it is of interest that a person on TLC’s “My Strange Addiction” eats approximately a square foot of mattress foam a day (full disclosure: I’ve previously appeared on TLC to debate Dr. Susan Bradley for an episode of “I Am Jazz” about the evidence on affirming care for trans youth, which I consider a higher pursuit than saying “look at this person eat mattress foam”). They are of interest in the same way that the dramatic life stories of guests on “The Jerry Springer Show” or “Maury” are of interest. Lowbrow media inviting viewers to gawk at people who have been othered as being notably unusual in some way is nothing new.
What’s different is the assumption that Wolscht’s life says anything about trans people generally, in a way that a cisgender mattressvore’s life does not say anything about cis people generally. Wolscht isn’t afforded the privilege of simply being a person who roleplays as a child – she is a trans person who roleplays as a child. Meanwhile, TLC guests who salivate in the presence of a Tempur-Pedic are not seen as a cis person who eats mattress foam. They are just a person who happens to eat mattresses. Wolscht doesn’t get to be unlabeled for her gender identity in that way, because Wolscht is trans.
Perhaps those who consider her to be notable in some way, or reflective upon trans people as a whole, have failed to appreciate just how many trans people exist. Assuming that 0.6% of the population is transgender, 46 million people around the world will be trans, and among them are just about every sort of person you can imagine. The fact that some of these people will recreationally roleplay as children – some of them might even eat mattresses! – has nothing to do with our transness, and everything to do with our humanity.
“A cis person eats mattresses. Let’s talk.” Does something feel off about that? Does the second sentence not quite follow from the first? Apply the rule of cisgender mattress-eaters whenever a trans person is in the headlines and it’s not really clear why. Would a cis person who roleplays as a child be seen as saying something about cis people as a whole? Would someone with a YouTube channel about cis issues see this as relevant content for cis-related discussion? Would this cis person’s image be taken for use in an article about a completely unrelated individual accused of sex crimes against children? Would hundreds of people see fit to debate about that cis person at length across numerous Reddit threads?
Would it really be necessary for anyone to hold an opinion on that specific cis person’s life choices at all?
So why should anyone care this much about what Stefonknee Wolscht does? ■