New study: Supprelin LA and less-expensive Vantas implant equally effective for blocking puberty in trans youth

Zinnia JonesPreviously, I’ve noted some rather concerning confusion among anti-trans activists on the subject of implanted puberty-blocking medications used in trans adolescents. Brie Jontry, a spokesperson for anti-trans hub 4thWaveNow, characterized the Vantas brand of once-yearly histrelin acetate implant as a “late-stage cancer drug” that was “never studied in young people”, and falsely claimed it was “contraindicated” for use in children. In reality, Vantas is merely “not indicated” for pediatric populations, and contains the same medication as the once-yearly Supprelin LA implant which is indicated for use in children with precocious puberty. Neither Vantas nor Supprelin LA are specifically FDA-approved for the indication of treating pediatric gender dysphoria, so the particular brand really makes no difference. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Update on cases of lymphoma linked to textured breast implants in transgender women (BIA-ALCL)

Zinnia JonesI’ve previously covered emerging findings on breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL), a type of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma caused by the textured surfaces of some implants used in breast augmentation surgeries. Textured surfaces have been used in some breast implants to promote better adherence of the surface to the fibrous capsule of scar tissue surrounding it, as implants with smooth surfaces may be more mobile within the breast by comparison. Teardrop-shaped or “gummy bear” silicone implants in particular make use of this textured surface to help the asymmetrically-shaped implant stay in place without shifting or rotating. It is the textured surface itself that appears to promote the development of this type of cancer, whereas breast implants with smooth surfaces are not associated with the condition (Turner, 2019). While many cases of BIA-ALCL can be identified and cured at an early stage, others can be aggressive, causing metastatic cancer and death. Continue reading

Posted in Breast, Health care, Oncology, Surgery, Transfeminine | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Lower doses of cyproterone acetate may be similarly effective for blocking testosterone, with a lower risk of adverse effects

Previously:

Disclaimer: I am not a medical professional and this is not medical advice.

Zinnia JonesCyproterone acetate (CPA) is an oral antiandrogen widely used outside the United States (Angus et al., 2019) as a part of feminizing HRT in combination with estrogen. In recent years, increasing evidence has emerged that long-term or high-dose use of CPA, such as in transition treatment for transfeminine people, is associated with a substantially elevated risk of developing meningiomas (Gil et al., 2011). These typically benign brain tumors can cause symptoms such as vision loss, headaches, muscle weakness, and seizures, and can require treatment with radiation or surgery.

The mechanism of CPA’s role in promoting the growth of these tumors is well-understood. CPA is an antiandrogen that occupies androgen receptors as an antagonist to block the binding of androgens like testosterone and prevent them from producing physically masculinizing effects, while also functioning as an antigonadotropin to direct the body to stop producing and releasing androgens. However, CPA is not only an antiandrogen – it’s also a progestogen, binding to progesterone receptors as an agonist and producing a very strong progestogenic effect. Additionally, the antiandrogenic and progestogenic effects of CPA are imbalanced, and so the doses needed to suppress testosterone in transfeminine people also produce a significant excess of progestogenic activity (Hammerstein, 1990). Continue reading

Posted in Endocrinology, Oncology, Progestogens, Transfeminine, Transgender medicine | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Once-yearly implanted puberty blockers may last for two years or more

Disclaimer: I am not a medical professional and this is not medical advice.

Zinnia JonesGnRH agonists are a class of medications that reversibly block the progression of natal puberty both in cis youth with precocious (early) puberty and in trans adolescents, allowing trans youth time for decision-making about whether to proceed with more permanent medical transition or discontinue blockers and resume their natal puberty. These drugs work at the pituitary gland to halt the release of LH and FSH which stimulate the production and release of sex hormones, meaning that trans girls on GnRH agonists will temporarily stop producing testosterone and trans boys will stop producing estrogen. If trans youth wish to go on to transition, they can continue taking blockers while receiving cross-sex hormones for the induction of their desired puberty. Continue reading

Posted in Endocrinology, Trans youth, Transgender medicine | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Trans women and transfeminine people taking HRT are far less likely to develop prostate cancer

Zinnia JonesConcerns over supposedly cancer-causing effects of cross-sex hormone therapy are an area in which public alarm has often pulled far ahead of the facts on transition and transgender health. For instance, in 2019, the Telegraph breathlessly reported that the “risk of breast cancer rises 46 times for trans women after hormone therapy”. What this framing omitted is that the study found trans women had a 70% lower likelihood of developing breast cancer compared to cis women, that the “absolute risk of breast cancer in transgender people remains low”, and that “following breast cancer screening guidelines for cisgender people seems sufficient for transgender people using hormone treatment” (de Blok et al., 2019).

Abigail Shrier, in her recent book Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Teenage Daughters, referred to a “suspected risk” of uterine and endometrial cancer in trans men taking testosterone, then upgraded this suspicion to the overt claim that testosterone “can raise the risk of endometrial cancer significantly” in an interview at the Heritage Foundation’s Daily Signal; Jonathon Van Maren’s review of Shrier’s book makes the completely separate claim that puberty-blocking medications used for trans adolescents “create a higher risk of” cancer, an assertion that was not made by Shrier. Continue reading

Posted in Endocrinology, Media, Oncology, Transphobia and prejudice | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment